Kalle Reflects on all Reflections so far

The FSSD Global platform is all about assisting Systemic (the whole World), Systematic (stepwise processes) and Strategic (improving on ROI all the way) planning for any kind of topic or organization that can exist in the future. It serves as an absolute (not relative) code for sustainable development. Once its intuitive logics for strategic planning, monitoring and communications are understood, it is like “hotel California” – you can check out but you can never leave. It is a mental model always possible to apply – during conversations in elevators, at coffee machines, in cars, boardrooms, or more formal meetings for cross-sector planning of any topic or organization at any scale. The Reflections are written in this context. Please find all the titles so far at the bottom of this reflection, and the full articles on our home page FSSD Global.

More in detail

Scientific terms of FSSD developments are not necessary for the thinking and doing. Because FSSD is completely intuitive as well as scientifically validated for sustainable (re)design. During sustainability related conversations, you need not even mention the scientific terms of FSSDs Operative system. Or, would anybody regard it as peculiar if, say a moderator of an annual meeting, or a chairman of the board, would introduce today’s organizational meeting like this in native English:

“We need a clear structure to develop our actions in context of the current unsustainable markets or regions, the largest challenge to civilizations ever. It’s about phasing out our current un-sustainable practices and innovatively develop sales of scalable solutions. So, let us all share an understanding of the issues we need to discuss today, and how they relate to a perfectly logical structure:

Are your proposed ideas and suggestions either about our business goals and their possible existence, vs. being doomed, on tomorrow’s markets?

Or, alternatively, are you proposing ideas about our current situation of opportunities and difficulties in context of such possible goals in the future?

Or, perhaps optional proposals of what to do in the creative tension field between now and the future?

Or, perhaps prioritizations of the optional proposals into stepwise planning towards our sustainable goals? (“SWOT”, or “Sustainability Chess”)”

A PhD thesis from Lisa Wälitalo has shown that the largest determinator for successful planning is when top managements are active part of planning in line with the above. To that end, the Reflections on the FSSD Global homepage carry many opportunities for training and learning of the FSSD, since all of them are written through a lens of the above Operative logics. And, again, sometimes without even mentioning the specific terms applied in scientific FSSD references.

The reflections so far, all to be found on this homepage:

The World’s Situation

The New EU directives for Corporate Sustainability Reporting

A Four-headed Elephant in the Economic Room

Leaders, where did they all go?

Silo thinking in context of Los Angeles on fire, Climate and war

Nuclear Power

Nuclear fusion power

Systems thinking helpful for S.D on one Condition

Spatial Planning

Ethics and Animals

Finance institutions

Common misunderstandings of Population Growth

Good vs. bad Data for AI assisted FSSD

Low consumption society

Naturalistic Fallacy

CO2 equivalents, ancient evolution, and CCS